Nikon f6 cena
![nikon f6 cena nikon f6 cena](https://www.fotovideoshop.sk/obchod_homedir/data/369/obrazky/nikon-dk-17-maly.jpg)
![nikon f6 cena nikon f6 cena](https://www.penta.cz/objektiv-samyang-300mm-f6-3-dslr-nikon-galerie-2-big_ies10356006.jpg)
The Nikon, Tamron, and Sony lenses are snappy. Wasn't thrilled by the Sigma 150-600 and 100-400 on the MC-11, but it's probably improved in the last few years. That makes it much more practical for hauling around, and eliminates the frustrating zoom locks. The Sony comparatively has a 1/4 turn throw, and it's fingertip light. Having a heavy 1/2 focus throw makes most of the lenses kind of impractical to use. All of them produce nice photos, but the Sony's handling is far better than the other options. The Sony 200-600 blows the other ultra-zooms out of the water.
#NIKON F6 CENA PLUS#
And yeah, just the AF alone is worth it plus the internal focusing.Īnybody had the opportunity to compare the image quality between those two? Stefano Ianiro has a video about when he switched from the Sigma 150-600 to the Sony 200-600. Go for the Sigma if saving some money is more important. I can buy the Sony lens for $1600 with a student discount. In my case, I bought the Sigma lens for $625 brand new from Adorama (deal of the decade, I guess). Now my question is, is the Sony 200-600mm double the better than the Sigma 150-600? As you know, the Sigma can be found for under $1000 and the Sony costs $2000.
![nikon f6 cena nikon f6 cena](https://gestoshop.gesto.cz/imgcache/e/d/p246055-164545-0a_540_540_9670.jpg)
Eventually, I would like to add a Sony full-frame camera that is good for landscape and wildlife. Since I already have the a6100, I am thinking about selling the 80D and Sigma lens and buy the Sony 200-600mm. I have yet to use the Sigma lens with the a6100. I tried the a6000 with the Sigma lens using MC-11 and it was not a very good experience (hard to focus and the balance). I also have the Sony a6000 and a6100 cameras.
![nikon f6 cena nikon f6 cena](https://foto-shop.si/nikon/43789-large_default/nikon-d6-body-pro-kit.jpg)
I feel like the Sony 200-600mm might give me a better result based on what I read in this thread. I am not sure if it is the camera or the lens or the cameramen. I shoot small birds and they keep moving. I have been using the Sigma 150-600mm C with the Canon 80D for the past few months and I find it very hard to focus on small birds. With both lenses you can produce very good results for wildlife but the Sony is just better. The analogue scale on the Sigma is an approximation and beyond 10m you have to guess how far away an object is. There is no distance scale on the lens but instead you have a digital scale in the camera which is more precise and you can measure objects up to 1000m. You also don't feel the mechanism working which is a little strange at the beginning. The lens collar is removable and easily rotatable. It is almost 1kg lighter and the zoom mechanism is internal which is a blessing. The Sony is still sharper at 600mm/F6.3 vs Sigma 600mm/F8. The Sony is sharp wide open at 600mm where the Sigma I had to stop down to F8 for sharp results. I've had the 150-600S for Canon and now the 200-600.